Well, the ‘Global Warming / Climate Change’ spin continues ad infinitum as the terminally gullible read and believe each other’s press releases. Few check for validity because frankly it’s too hard. Most just go with the flow playing follow the leader assuming the one before them did the homework. God forbid anyone should rock the boat and challenge the status quo. I’m a boat rocker. Yes I know that comes as a complete surprise! I’m not a boat rocker by choice but by calling. The way I see it, like the foolish virgins of Matthew 25 the ‘professing church’ is fast asleep in the bottom of the boat. It has grown fat, lazy and complacent. It surrounded itself with luxurious, melodic ambience and then … nodded off. It follows ‘the world’ around like a lost puppy, unquestioningly digesting the diatribe its spin doctors dispense. It no longer tests the spirits. It no longer takes every word captive making them obedient to the Saviour. It is afraid to offend, preferring to be popular and relative to the culture. It is tepid, vain, shallow, cowardly and suffering from terminal ‘affluenza’. It is NOT the true church. The following articles show conclusively that the whole ‘climate change’ issue is FAR from a fact and that the players are NOWHERE NEAR consensus.
But before we get to that … I am sometimes asked why I am so ‘aggressive’ in ministry and why the Watchman Report is so ‘negative’. My answer is consistently: “This is not a game, it is a WAR!” The Watchman is commanded to sound the Shofar with gusto. Its purpose is to WARN of an approaching enemy. People who are woken out of a blissfully deep sleep by a thundering Shofar are most often angered. Frankly I could care less. As far as I am concerned they should not have been asleep in the first place! Time is short. The enemy has breached the sanctuary and walks among us. Oh that the Father would have no need of Watchmen. Oh that those who are called by His Name would stay awake just one hour. Oh that those who claim to belong to Him would be faithful to His Word instead of their ego - not feathering their earthly nest by storing up treasures herein where moths destroy and thieves steal. Oh that they would STUDY to show themselves approved.
BTW – No word as yet from Family First. *sigh*
Tony and Pamela Dean
Article courtesy of Cutting Edge Ministries
As the global propaganda campaign to convince peoples of the world that Global Warming is a critical issue reaches the highest level of scary rhetoric ever, more and more true scientists are sounding the alarm that this whole issue is bogus.
First, let us review the latest in scary tactics.
BRIEF: "'Five Years Left To Save The Planet'
", Sky News,
"Our planet is just five years away from climate change catastrophe - but can still be saved, according to a new report. The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) warns governments have until 2012 to "plant the seeds of change" and make positive moves to limit carbon emissions. If they fail to do so, the WWF's Vision For 2050 warns 'generations to come will have to live with the compromises and hardships caused by their inability to act'."
Now, that is a frightening prospect, don't you think? What parent or grandparent wants to leave this kind of world to their children and grandchildren? This kind of statement is calculated to spring forth a very real emotion in the hearts of untold millions of parents and grandparents.
" 'We have a small window of time in which we can plant the seeds of change, and that is the next five years', James Leape, from the WWF, said. 'We cannot afford to waste them. This is not something that governments can put off until the future."
Five years from now, the world will stand at 2012. Is it just a coincidence?
* That 2012 is the day in the Mayan Calendar which is the End of the World? New Age leaders have been pointing to 2012 as the year in which the New Age Messiah might arise.
* That 2012 is the year when Prince William turns 30? That age is the minimum age for a Jewish leader to become a Rabbi, which is why Yahshua started His ministry at that age. If Prince Charles is not going to arise in this immediate time frame as the Antichrist, many people believe that Prince William will be that Masonic Christ. After all, the Illuminati always has a "Plan A" and a "Plan B".
Now, let us view the news story which reports that more and more distinguished scientists are changing their minds about the Global Warming issue and are beginning to sound the alarm.
BRIEF: "Climate Momentum Shifting:
Prominent Scientists Reverse Belief in Man-made Global Warming - Now
"Many former believers in catastrophic man-made global warming have recently reversed themselves and are now climate sceptics. The names included below are just a sampling of the prominent scientists who have spoken out recently to oppose former Vice President Al Gore, the United Nations, and the media driven 'consensus' on man-made global warming."
"The list below is just the tip of the iceberg. A more detailed and comprehensive sampling of scientists who have only recently spoken out against climate hysteria will be forthcoming in a soon to be released U.S. Senate report. Please stay tuned to this website, as this new government report is set to redefine the current climate debate."
"In the meantime, please review the list of scientists below and ask yourself why the media is missing one of the biggest stories in climate of 2007 ... The voices of rank and file scientists opposing climate doomsayers can serve as a counter to the alarmism that children are being exposed to on a daily basis ... The media's climate fear factor seemingly grows louder even as the latest science grows less and less alarming by the day."
From whence did this global warming propaganda originate? Quoting from our Headline News article, NEWS2193, entitled, "Five Major Created Global Disasters Are Being Constantly Preached To The World As Reasons To Form The Global New World Order!", we read that this travesty can be directly traced back to 1917.
"The secret societies were planning as far back as 1917 to invent an artificial threat ... in order to bring humanity together in a one-world government which they call the New World Order." [William Cooper, "Behold A Pale Horse", p. 27]
But, this planned global disaster scenario was first proposed in the Illuminati document called, "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion", written at least 150 years ago. Listen:
"When we come into our kingdom, our orators will expound great problems which have turned humanity upside down in order to bring it, at the end, under our beneficent rule. Who will ever suspect, then, that all these peoples were stage-managed by us according to a political plan which no one has so much as guessed at in the course of many centuries?" [End of Protocol No. 13 ]
At the very time when Mass Media is sounding the scary alarm in the most terrible, and immediate terms, true scientists are beginning to sound the alarm that the entire issue is bogus, and can be disproven by genuine science.
Therefore, the question of the hour regarding this trumped-up issue is clear: Will the well-oiled propaganda machine serving Global Illuminati prove more powerful than the truth now coming from respected scientists?
My bet is on the well-oiled propaganda machine. As that master propagandist, Adolf Hitler, once remarked:
"Truth is not what is; truth is what people perceive it to be".
"What luck for rulers that people do not think"
Climate Momentum Shifting: Prominent Scientists Reverse Belief in Man-made Global Warming
Now Sceptics Growing Number of Scientists Convert to Sceptics After Reviewing New Research
Posted by Marc Morano – Marc_Morano@EPW.Senate.Gov -
Following the U.S. Senate's vote today on a global warming measure (see today's AP article: Senate Defeats Climate Change Measure,) it is an opportune time to examine the recent and quite remarkable momentum shift taking place in climate science. Many former believers in catastrophic man-made global warming have recently reversed themselves and are now climate sceptics. The names included below are just a sampling of the prominent scientists who have spoken out recently to oppose former Vice President Al Gore, the United Nations, and the media driven “consensus” on man-made global warming.
The list below is just the tip of the iceberg. A more detailed and comprehensive sampling of scientists who have only recently spoken out against climate hysteria will be forthcoming in a soon to be released U.S. Senate report. Please stay tuned to this website, as this new government report is set to redefine the current climate debate.
In the meantime, please review the list
of scientists below and ask yourself why the media is missing one of the
biggest stories in climate of 2007. Feel free to distribute the partial
list of scientists who recently converted to sceptics to your
local schools and universities. The voices of rank and file
scientists opposing climate doomsayers can serve as a counter to
the alarmism that children are being exposed to on a daily basis. (See
The media's climate fear factor
seemingly grows louder even as the latest science grows less and less alarming
by the day. (See Der Spiegel
Once Believers, Now Sceptics ( Link to pdf version )
Geophysicist Dr. Claude
Allegre, a top geophysicist and French Socialist who
has authored more than 100 scientific articles and written 11 books and received
numerous scientific awards including the Goldschmidt Medal from the Geochemical
Society of the United States,
converted from climate alarmist to skeptic in 2006. Allegre, who was one of the first scientists to sound
global warming fears 20 years ago, now says the cause of climate change is
"unknown" and accused the “prophets of doom of global warming” of
being motivated by money, noting that "the ecology of helpless protesting
has become a very lucrative business for some people!" “Glaciers’
chronicles or historical archives point to the fact that climate is a
capricious phenomena. This fact is confirmed by mathematical meteorological
theories. So, let us be cautious,” Allegre explained
in a September 21, 2006 article in the French newspaper L'EXPRESS. The National Post in
Geologist Bruno Wiskel of the University of Alberta recently reversed his view of man-made climate change and instead became a global warming skeptic. Wiskel was once such a big believer in man-made global warming that he set out to build a “Kyoto house” in honor of the UN sanctioned Kyoto Protocol which was signed in 1997. Wiskel wanted to prove that the Kyoto Protocol’s goals were achievable by people making small changes in their lives. But after further examining the science behind Kyoto, Wiskel reversed his scientific views completely and became such a strong skeptic, that he recently wrote a book titled “The Emperor's New Climate: Debunking the Myth of Global Warming.” A November 15, 2006 Edmonton Sun article explains Wiskel’s conversion while building his “Kyoto house”: “Instead, he said he realized global warming theory was full of holes and ‘red flags,’ and became convinced that humans are not responsible for rising temperatures.” Wiskel now says “the truth has to start somewhere.” Noting that the Earth has been warming for 18,000 years, Wiskel told the Canadian newspaper, “If this happened once and we were the cause of it, that would be cause for concern. But glaciers have been coming and going for billions of years." Wiskel also said that global warming has gone "from a science to a religion” and noted that research money is being funneled into promoting climate alarmism instead of funding areas he considers more worthy. "If you funnel money into things that can't be changed, the money is not going into the places that it is needed,” he said.
Astrophysicist Dr. Nir Shaviv, one of
Israel's top young award winning scientists, recanted his belief that manmade emissions were driving
climate change. ""Like many others, I was personally sure that CO2 is
the bad culprit in the story of global warming. But after carefully digging
into the evidence, I realized that things are far more complicated than the
story sold to us by many climate scientists or the stories regurgitated by the
media. In fact, there is much more than meets the eye,” Shaviv
Mathematician & engineer
Dr. David Evans, who did carbon accounting for the Australian Government, recently detailed his conversion to a skeptic. “I devoted six years to carbon accounting,
building models for the Australian government to estimate carbon emissions from
land use change and forestry. When I started that job in 1999 the evidence that
carbon emissions caused global warming seemed pretty conclusive, but since then
new evidence has weakened the case that carbon emissions are the main cause. I
am now skeptical,” Evans wrote in an
Climate researcher Dr. Tad Murty,
former Senior Research Scientist for Fisheries and Oceans in Canada, also reversed himself from believer
in man-made climate change to a skeptic. “I
stated with a firm belief about global warming, until I started working on it
myself,” Murty explained on
Botanist Dr. David Bellamy, a famed UK environmental campaigner, former lecturer at Durham
University and host of a popular UK TV series on wildlife, recently converted into a skeptic after reviewing the science and now calls global
warming fears "poppycock." According to a
Climate scientist Dr. Chris de Freitas of The University of Auckland, N.Z., also converted from a believer in man-made global warming to a skeptic. “At first I accepted that increases in human caused additions of carbon dioxide and methane in the atmosphere would trigger changes in water vapor etc. and lead to dangerous ‘global warming,’ But with time and with the results of research, I formed the view that, although it makes for a good story, it is unlikely that the man-made changes are drivers of significant climate variation.” de Freitas wrote on August 17, 2006. “I accept there may be small changes. But I see the risk of anything serious to be minute,” he added. “One could reasonably argue that lack of evidence is not a good reason for complacency. But I believe the billions of dollars committed to GW research and lobbying for GW and for Kyoto treaties etc could be better spent on uncontroversial and very real environmental problems (such as air pollution, poor sanitation, provision of clean water and improved health services) that we know affect tens of millions of people,” de Freitas concluded. de Freitas was one of the 60 scientists who wrote an
Meteorologist Dr. Reid Bryson, the founding chairman of the
Department of Meteorology at University of Wisconsin (now the Department of
Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, was pivotal in promoting the coming ice age scare of the
1970’s ( See Time Magazine’s 1974 article “Another Ice Age” citing Bryson: & see Newsweek’s 1975 article “The
citing Bryson) has now converted into a leading global warming skeptic. In
Global warming author and economist Hans H.J. Labohm started out as a man-made global warming believer but he later
switched his view after conducting climate research. Labohm
Paleoclimatologist Tim Patterson, of Carlton University in Ottawa converted from believer in C02 driving
the climate change to a skeptic. “I taught my
students that CO2 was the prime driver of climate change,” Patterson wrote on
Physicist Dr. Zbigniew Jaworowski, chairman of the Central Laboratory for the
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Radiological Protection
in Warsaw, took
a scientific journey from a believer of man-made climate change in the form of
global cooling in the 1970’s all the way to converting to a skeptic
of current predictions of catastrophic man-made global warming. “At the
beginning of the 1970s I believed in man-made climate cooling, and therefore I
started a study on the effects of industrial pollution on the global
atmosphere, using glaciers as a history book on this pollution,” Dr. Jaworowski, wrote on August 17, 2006. “With the
advent of man-made warming political correctness in the beginning
of 1980s, I already had a lot of experience with polar and high
altitude ice, and I have serious problems in accepting the reliability
of ice core CO2 studies,” Jaworowski added. Jaworowski, who has published many papers on climate with a
focus on CO2 measurements in ice cores, also dismissed the UN IPCC summary and
questioned what the actual level of C02 was in the atmosphere in a March 16,
2007 report in EIR science entitled “CO2: The Greatest Scientific Scandal of
Our Time.” “We thus find ourselves in the situation that the entire theory of
man-made global warming—with its repercussions in science, and its important
consequences for politics and the global economy—is based on ice core studies
that provided a false picture of the atmospheric CO2 levels,” Jaworowski wrote. “For the past three decades, these
well-known direct CO2 measurements, recently compiled and analyzed
by Ernst-Georg Beck (Beck 2006a, Beck 2006b, Beck
2007), were completely ignored by climatologists—and not because they were
wrong. Indeed, these measurements were made by several Nobel Prize winners,
using the techniques that are standard textbook procedures in chemistry,
biochemistry, botany, hygiene, medicine, nutrition, and ecology. The only
reason for rejection was that these measurements did not fit the hypothesis of
anthropogenic climatic warming. I regard this as perhaps the greatest
scientific scandal of our time,” Jaworowski wrote.
“The hypothesis, in vogue in the 1970s, stating that emissions of industrial
dust will soon induce the new Ice Age, seem now to be a conceited
anthropocentric exaggeration, bringing into discredit the science of that time.
The same fate awaits the present,” he added. Jaworowski
believes that cosmic rays and solar activity are major drivers of the Earth’s
climate. Jaworowski was one of the 60 scientists who
Dr. Ian D. Clark, professor of the Department of Earth Sciences at University
reversed his views on man-made climate change after further examining the
evidence. “I used to agree with these dramatic warnings of climate disaster. I
taught my students that most of the increase in temperature of the past century
was due to human contribution of C02. The association seemed so clear and
simple. Increases of greenhouse gases were driving us towards a climate
Environmental geochemist Dr. Jan Veizer,
professor emeritus of University of Ottawa, converted from believer to skeptic after conducting scientific studies of climate
history. “I simply accepted the (global warming) theory as given,” Veizer wrote on
More to follow...