The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun. Ecclesiastes 1:9


    Rudd and Warren - Birds of a Feather
  Australian Fabian Socialism


You know it really isn't all that difficult to find a link between Rick Warren and all that is wrong with the world. In fact, one needen't even look because the bleeding obvious jumps right out at you. And the same applies to Australian Labor Party leader Kevin Rudd quite frankly.

Someone once said, "If it ain't broke, fix it till it is". It is the mantra of all things bureaucrat. But why would anyone think to change a government which by its own merit and the grace of God has brought about national economic prosperity in its own right by eliminating government debt, reduced the interest rate from Keating's 17+% down to 3%, achieved record low unemployment, maintained social justice and secured personal prosperity for those willing to get off their tooche and do a decent day's work. Why change? Because communist sympathising, leftist louts bitter about the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, America in general, David Hick's detainment, logging in Tasmania, Industrial Relations changes, the colour of John Howard's tie and the rejection of land rights for gay whales have bought themselves some media outlets and are using them for all they're worth to generate 'spin' - and woe betide anyone who dares to challenge them. Well, never one to shy away from a good stouche
It's no longer about the individual but the collective have you noticed that? Everywhere you go it's all about 'unity', 'community' and 'unitedness'. And while such a concept is (on the surface) a noble pursuit, when viewed from the Babylon perspective it takes on a far more ominous tone. It is another expression of creeping communism and as we have long been insisting because the church is fast asleep it fails to see such an intrusion.
Nations are being urged to surrender their sovereignty for the sake of collective world unity. Individuals are having their inalienable rights removed for the sake of the collective good. Individualism is out and commune-ism is in. Not surprisingly the Pied Piper of all things Purpose Driven Rick Warren wrote: "You cannot fulfill God's purposes for your life by yourself . . . you need a group". Oh really!? Pass that by Moses in the wilderness; Isaiah alone in the cave hiding from Jezebel, Elijah sojourning at the Brook of Cherith; Paul on the road to Emmaus and the Messiah Himself as He spent time alone with the Father.

Warren is simply wrong! The Word of God is lucid that the Holy Spirit works in the heart of the individual who is attuned to His leading by hearing, studying and meditating on His written Word. No group therepy is required in fact, as we have learned from previous studies Group Think is potentially dangerous. But Warren et al are merely following the beat of a different drum down the road to perdition, satiating the demands of the United Nations and ultimately the coming antichrist of which the Bible has long warned. So what has all this to do with Fabian Socialism? The alternative Australian government espouse world views which are not only contrary to contemporary Christian values but also to common sense. A point in question is Labor's Racial Villification laws which target so called 'hate speech' (pollie waffle for 'anything espousing Christian values') that has seen two Christian pastors Daniel Scot and Danny Nalliah facing jail and huge fines for enlightening people as to the teachings of Islam. Bracks has them in Victoria, Rann will introduce them here in South Australia and should he win government so too will Rudd because it is typical anti Christian Labor policy.
The Australian Labor Party are Fabian Socialists. So, what is Fabian Socialism?

Fabian: Of, relating to, or being a member of the Fabian Society, which was committed to gradual rather than revolutionary means for spreading socialist principles. Seeking victory by delay and harassment rather than by a decisive battle as in the manner of Fabius Maximus: Fabian policy.

Socialism: (in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of collectivist principles
.
Socialist: One who adheres to the principals of Socialism.

So, plainly put Fabian Socialists are those who seek to transform a Capitalist state into a Communist state by process using Hegelian Dialectical reason.
And there we have the great divide between Capitalism and Communism, a great conflict which doesn't actually exist because Communism is a ruse in application. Designed to 'change the world,' the stated goal of the Marxists is to promote global conflicts [reasoning through some twisted logic that only by warring will mankind see the futility of war] create chaos and disorder [such as climate change / global warming rhetoric] and offer up a predetermined solution - an evolved society benevolently ruled exclusively by them. This is classic Hegelian Dialectic at work.

Fabian Socialists believe in the concept of what is called "Utopian Plenty" where everyone shares equally in the community having been provided for and overseen by the government. The fundamental problem with their idea is that governments don't produce anything. The only way a government can 'provide' anything is to take it away from those who produced it in the first place. This is what happened in Soviet Russia. The government didn't encourage prosperity and growth for the little guy, they practiced 'community policing' on dissidents and Ukrainian farmers because they refused to shut up and 'donate' their hard labour. Now, closer to home ...

The Australian Fabian Society was established in 1947. It is Australia's longest running political think tank. Inspired by the Fabian Society in the United Kingdom, it is dedicated to Fabianism, the focus on the advancement of socialist ideas through gradual influence and patiently insinuating socialist ideology into intellectual circles and groups with power.

The Australian Fabian Society has had close historical ties with the Australian Labor Party, also known as the ALP. This is evident in the number of past Australian Labor Party Prime Ministers, Federal Ministers and State Premiers who were, and are, active members of the Australian Fabian Society. The current President of the Australian Fabian Society is former Australian Prime Minister Gough Whitlam.

The Australian Fabian Society has had a significant influence on public policy development in Australia since the Second World War, with many of its members having held the highest levels of political power and influence in the land.
The Australian Fabian Society cites their 'Four General Aims' on their organisation's website as being:

1. To contribute to a renaissance of left of centre and progressive thought, by generating and disseminating ideas that are original, meet the challenge of the times, and are of high intellectual quality.
2. To contribute, by getting these ideas into the public domain, to the creation of a left of centre political culture and consensus.
3. To help create an active movement of people identifying with the left of centre and engaged in political debate.
4. To influence the ideas and policies of the Labor Party (and other parties) and Labor Governments to encourage progressive reform in practice.[2]
Lots of 'left of centres' in there, must be a big deal to them. Sad that anyone would boast of such a flaw isn't it?


  Notable members:

  • Gough Whitlam (ALP Prime Minister 1972-75)
  • Bob Hawke (ALP Prime Minister 1983-1991)
  • Paul Keating (ALP Prime Minister 1991-1996)
  • John Cain (ALP Former Premier of Victoria)
  • Jim Cairns (ALP Former Deputy Prime Minister)
  • Don Dunstan (ALP Former Premier of South Australia)
  • Neville Wran (ALP Former Premier of NSW 1976-86)
  • Frank Crean (ALP Former Deputy Prime Minister)
  • Arthur Calwell (Former ALP Leader)
  • Henry Hyde Champion (Journalist)
  • John Percy Jones (Businessman)
  • Nettie Palmer (Writer)
  • Ernest Besant-Scott (Historian)
  • Lucy Morice (Feminist)
  • Charles Strong (Clergyman)
  • William Henry Archer (Statistician)
  • Charles Marson (Clergyman)
  • David Charleston (Trade Unionist)
  • John Howlett Ross (Teacher)
  • Bernard O'Dowd (Writer)

Under socialism...everyone is controlled by the government, the government is controlled by politicians, and politicians are bought and sold by wealthy men and corporations.
That is why Andrew Carnegie, and other men of great wealth, favour socialism. Andrew Carnegie embraced Lord Tennyson's vision in 1893 in his book "Triumphant Democracy"
And just what was Lord Tennyson's vision? It was a vision of a coming one world government encapsulated in the following poem entitled "Locksley Hall":

  "For I dipt into the future, far as human eye could see,
Saw the Vision of the world, and all the wonder that would be;
Heard the heavens fill with shouting, and there rain'd a ghastly dew
From the nations' airy navies grappling in the central blue;
Till the war-drum throbb'd no longer, and the battle flags were furl'd
In the Parliament of Man, the Federation of the world.
There the common sense of most shall hold a fretful realm in awe,
And the kindly earth shall slumber, lapt in universal law."


   Let's get this straight, Socialists believe in a One World Government!


    There is probably no one who has devoted more effort than George Watson to tracing the historical sources of totalitarian ideas in socialist intellectual thought going back to Marx and the revolution of 1848. Watson has published his findings, first in "The Idea of Liberalism" (1985) and now in "The Lost Literature of Socialism" (1998). Watson states, in both publications, that:

' ... the long socialist tradition of genocide ... was almost a century old when Hitler began his programme of racial mass-murder in 1941-2. ... In the European century that began in the 1840s, as I have shown, everyone who advocated genocide called himself a socialist, and no conservative, liberal, anarchist or independent ever did anything of the kind. Lenin and Stalin had been exterminating people for years when Hitler began.'

Hitler was also arguably a socialist: in his own words, and according to those who knew him. Hitler's socialism was only a variant of the genre. Hitler's close confidant in the 1930s, Hermann Rauschning, published conversations with Hitler in "Hitler Speaks" (1939). The following are some remarks by Hitler on communism:

"I have learnt a great deal from Marxism, as I do not hesitate to admit," Hitler went on. "I don't mean their tiresome social doctrine or the materialist conception of history, or their absurd 'marginal utility' theories and so on. But I have learnt from their methods. The difference between them and myself is that I have really put into practice what these peddlers and pen-pushers have timidly begun. The whole of National Socialism is based on it. Look at the workers' sports clubs, the industrial cells, the mass demonstrations, the propaganda leaflets written specially for the comprehension of masses; all these new methods of political struggle are essentially Marxist in origin. All that I had to do was take over these methods and adapt them to our purpose. I had only to develop logically what Social Democracy repeatedly failed in because of its attempt to realise its evolution within the framework of democracy. National Socialism is what Marxism might have been if it could have broken its absurd and artificial ties with a democratic order. ... there is more that binds us to Bolshevism than separates us from it. There is, above all, genuine, revolutionary feeling, which is alive everywhere in Russia except where there are Jewish Marxists. I have always made allowance for this circumstance, and given orders that former Communists are to be admitted to the party at once. The petit bourgeois Social-Democrat and the trade-union boss will never make a National Socialist, but the Communist always will."

Marxism was the foundation for the Fabian Socialist agenda when they merged with the British Labor Party in 1904, and the entire labor movement are convinced their principals are based in Marxism. Considering the close affinity between the British and Australian Fabians there is obvious consensus between the two.

Havelock Ellis writes in "Task of Social Hygiene" (1912), in Chapter XII - Individualism and Socialism, pg. 402:

'So it is that the question of breed, the production of fine individuals, the elevation of the ideal of quality in human production over that of mere quantity, begins to be seen, not merely as a noble ideal in itself, but as the only method by which Socialism can be enabled to continue on its present path.'

Rudd's Personality Profiles! Ellis sees 'quality in human production' as a 'noble ideal' and necessary for socialism to 'continue on its present path'. And continue it certainly does.
Ellis writes:

'Through the slow growth of knowledge concerning hereditary conditions, by voluntary self-restraint, by the final disappearance of the lingering prejudice against the control of procreation, by sterilization in special cases, by methods of pressure which need not amount to actual compulsion, it will be possible to attain an increasingly firm grip on the evil elements of heredity. Not until such measures as these, under the controlling influence of a sense of personal responsibility extending to every member of the community, have long been put into practice, can we hope to see man on the earth risen to his full stature, healthy in body, noble in spirit, beautiful in both alike, moving spaciously and harmoniously among his fellows in the great world of Nature'...

Another notable whose ideological proclivities are not talked about is H.G. Wells. Remembered today only as a famous writer of science fiction, he was a member of the Fabian society which led the socialist political movement in the first part of the 20th century. The Fabians included the famous - or infamous, depending on where one stands on the issue - Sidney and Beatrice Webb and George Bernard Shaw. In 1902, H.G. Wells published a work titled: "Anticipations of the Reaction of Mechanical and Scientific Progress Upon Human Life and Thought". The last chapter in this book is named "The Faith of the New Republic". It is clear that this faith is neither Christianity, nor perhaps any other transcendentalist faith. Wells speaks of a new class of humans which he calls "the dominant men of the new time". He writes:

'They will find in themselves - it must be remembered I am speaking of a class that has naturally segregated, and not of men as a whole - a desire, a passion almost, to create and organize, to put in order, to get the maximum result from certain possibilities. They will be artists in reality, with a passion for simplicity and directness and an impatience of confusion and inefficiency. The determining frame of their ethics ... will be the elaboration of that future world state to which all things are pointing. ... It is manifest that a reconstructed ethical system ... will give very different values from those given by the existing system ... the ethical system of these men of the New Republic, the ethical system which will dominate the world state, will be shaped primarily to favour the procreation of what is fine and efficient and beautiful in humanity - beautiful and strong bodies, clear and powerful minds, and a growing body of knowledge - and to check the procreation of base and servile types, of fear-driven and cowardly souls, of all that is mean and ugly and bestial in the souls, bodies, or habits of men. To do the latter is to do the former; the two things are inseparable.'

Wells glorifies a 'class that has naturally segregated', who will have the 'passion ... to get the maximum result from certain possibilities', like 'artists in reality', and whose ethical system 'will give very different values'. This later became the self-portrait of the Communist Commissar as well as the Nazi Gauleiter who both thought that they were the men of Well's New Republic, each toiling zealously to create a world state according to his paradigm of perfection. One wonders if Kevin Rudd sees such 'grandeur' in his own political future.

Satan sympathiser George Bernard Shaw describes the Nazi government as National Socialist Fascist. The truth is that western socialist intellectuals of the last century conceived of what can only be called evil methodologies for building of a "perfect" society; methodologies that informed and inspired the leaders of all shades of totalitarianism, from red to black to brown.

'Evil Methodologies' did you notice that? Even humanists refer to Rick Warren's socialist dialectic strategies as evil.

George Irbe referring to Socialists comments:

"So thought and wrote a large group of the western intellectual elite for close to a hundred years. They were influential in shaping the attitudes of the general public concerning societal problems and how to solve them. They did their best to keep the general public in the west ignorant of what was taking place under the totalitarian regimes. They spun their web of lies while millions perished according to "solutions" they themselves had recommended as necessary in order for socialism to succeed. Are they not accessories to mass murder before, during, and after the fact?"

Guilt by association indeed.

Rudd and the whole Labor Party machine are cogs in an unrelenting edifice and (one hopes) few of them are privy to its final product. Socialism in all its hues IS Communism, with its Hegelian Dialectic gobbledegook it is bowing down to the United Nation's one world government plan. The aspirations of the individual are denied so that the design of the collective will be achieved, That is why the Labor Party is so opposed to conscience voting for individual members, the party line must be towed. That is why the Labor Party is so opposed to 'individual' agreements (AWA's) and why it is so obsessed with 'collective' contracts - because that is the Communist Manifesto embodied.

This is why Rick Warren (in bed with communistic methodology) insists that individuals cannot realize God's potential by themselves but only in the collective - it is the same evil dialectic. What does the Word of God say about evil associations?
Stay away from people who are not followers of the Lord! Can someone who is good get along with someone who is evil? Are light and darkness the same? Is Christ a friend of Satan? Can people who follow the Lord have anything in common with those who don't?  2 Corinthians 6:14-15 CEV

But then what would Warren and his disciples know about the Word?

In the same chapter (above) Ellis quotes from a pamphlet on "Socialism and Eugenics" by a Dr. Eden Paul:

"Whereas both Socialism and Eugenics are concerned solely with the application of the knowledge gained by experience to the amelioration of the human lot, it seems preferable to dispense with religious terminology, and regard the two doctrines as complementary parts of the great modern movement known by the name of Humanism."

Isn't that interesting? "it seems preferable to dispense with religious terminology" - let's all get seeker sensitive, let's do away with 'religious terminology so as both to not offend those we are seeking to 'convert' and synthesize the two into one! You see that's what the Dialectic is: Thesis + Antithesis = Synthesis. In other words: Christian thought + Pagan thought = a hybrid of both. Again, read 2 Corinthians 6:14-15 and tell me Warren and his cohorts are on the right track. And how about this one:

Don't you know that your bodies are part of the body of Christ? Is it right for me to join part of the body of Christ to a prostitute? No, it isn't! Don't you know that a man who does that becomes part of her body? The Scriptures say, "The two of them will be like one person." 1 Corinthians 6:15-16 CEV

Fabian Socialism and the godless Communist ideal are one and the same. Now you can better understand Dominionist thought. It is a centralist theocracy maintained by the 'holy' elite to the subjugation of the masses - can you see it? Warren's 40 whatever is simply a gloved hand of the same beast. So too is Fabian Socialism a gloved hand of a greater beast. Warren and Rudd speak the same language. Perhaps they should get together, chew the fat and puzzle over why neither of them will ever get my vote!

Tony Dean
Moriah Ministries Australia
© 2007


  HOME